William is a Security Administrator who has added address translation for his
internal Web server to be accessible by external clients. Due to poor network design
by his predecessor, William sets up manual NAT rules for this server, while his FTP
server and SMTP server are both using automatic NAT rules.350-001 All traffic from his
FTP and SMTP servers are passing through the Security Gateway without a
problem, but traffic from the Web server is dropped because of anti-spoofing
settings. What is causing this?
Leading the way in IT testing and certification tools, www.certifyme.com
- 51 -
A. "Allow bi-directional NAT" is not checked in Global Properties.640-802
B. "Translate destination on client side" is not checked in Global Properties under
"Manual NAT Rules".
C. "Translate destination on client side" is not checked in Global Properties > Automatic
NAT Rules.VCP-310
D. Routing is not configured correctly.
E. Manual NAT rules are not configured correctly.
Answer: B
Explanation: Checkpoint asks this question for making relation between
antispoofing and "translate destination on client site" properties.. Questions
emphasizes this with the last sentence "., but the traffic from web server is dropped
because of antispoofing settings..".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment